Resolution  
                                                                                    March 21, 1999          

This new version of an interactive communication device relies on the notion of conferencing, a video watch in a sort of open symposium with an open access. As you may know today this is a highly sought after idea in movies, 24hr Web cams, and art installations such as Diller and Scofidio. By placing the public in the position of questioners, we create responses from other participants, which then will establish a chain of Q&A communicated through real time video conferencing.

The public will have two types of input in a solely interactive manner. First through their immediate image projecting at the other campus while using the installation; and the other is their text will be presented in a projection form along with their image. This is a sort of open chat forum with emphases on UC issues which the core of it’s communication will be broadcasting and projecting information for others to see and/or interact while it is being transmitted. The installation will engage the participants to collaborate in real time, each time with different contextual result. I’m hoping to promote a sort of open communication through the already existing technology (found technology). Although this set up is designed for two campuses, it can be easily stretched to other UC campuses with excellent results, creating an open forum of communicating students and faculties across the UC system. The process is quite fluid.

The core of the system is a simple to use conferencing software similar to the Java chat applets scattered on the Web. However, here we also have the participant’s image in a rough and life like manner. The textual communication is flawless and the exchanged text will be displayed and sent back and forth in a very fast and efficient way. This is even true if all the UC campuses were participating and communicating at the same time. The image is not as high resolution as the previous proposal; thus, the resources and costs are greatly decreased. However, for the characteristics of this project the quality of the images are ideal, and add to the anomaly in anonymous communication inherent in today’s virtual domain. The result of the communication then is projected onto few large and somewhat transparent frosted glass panels with cut out openings. As the image and scrolling text being projected penetrate layer by layers it fades and compliments the notion of clarity in an electronic communication age. The result can be stunning with its own entity-like presence. This outcome is an aesthetically dynamic art installation with interactive functionality, inviting hence bringing all sort of UC affiliates together.

The operation is simple and does not need an operator. The public will be the operators. Each day for the duration of the installation (for instance one semester period, 5 day per week, 10 am to 8 PM) one individual in each campus turns on the computer, loges in the school network, and turns on the projector, starts the software and sends an initial text and image automatically (will take 15 min). Even a 10-year-old kid can operate this system. There will be no other software on the computers, except the Windows operating system, and the conferencing software which will be loaded on the network, thus it can not be changed or manipulated. The computer and mini cam are the only devices accessible to the public and it will be anchored down as in the library computer labs. 

The LCD projector will be installed high up and close to the ceiling. There will be a regular spot lighting aimed at the position of the participants and the computer so their image will be clear and bright. The rest of the room ambient will be dimmer, so the projected contents on the glasses can be fully presented, with dynamics. The 3 glass panels (walls) are very durable and it is securely placed with fasteners to the ground, additionally they are safely beveled (there are no more breakage danger (even less) than a glass door in the building) They can not be moved but the public can move between them. The only connection will be to the Fast Ether net and the closest network router (the same that connects departments’ computers to the UC network) which is available in most buildings and can be brought to the location through simple wiring. One or two graduate students or faculty members will be in charge of turning it on and off during the semester. 

                      

The list of materials:

·                    One LCD projector per campus

·                    One PC computer per campus (200 MHz, 96 Meg RAM, w/monitor, dual video out put, and Ethernet card)

·                    One Video Conferencing software per campus

·                    One conferencing camera per campus (included With software as a kit)

·                    At least three sheets of 1/2” thick frosted glass per campus, With beveled edges, approximately 8’ height by 13’width.

·                    Hardware for anchoring the glass panels, projector, and a computer stand.

Budget:

 

Costs for two campuses

 

Costs for each additional campus

2

LCD Projectors

$6000-$7000

 

$3500

2

PC Computer stations

$2000-$2500

 

$1250

2

Video conferencing software & camera kit

$285

 

$145

6

Sheets of frosted, beveled glass

$1250

 

$625

2

Sets of misc. hardware for installation

$250

 

$125

2

Glass transportation (?)

$200

 

$100

TOTAL (for two campuses)

$11,485

 

$5742

This budget is the maximum cost of the installation in two campuses. However, some figures such as the installation of an Ethernet hub is not estimated in the total, though if necessary it will not be significant. With approximately $11,500, it is possible to have a full-fledged convocation, and communicative installation, which will serve as long as being used.


Tentative installation plan:

·        At this time the conferencing software and mini-cams are already acquired and ready to use.

·        After the approval of the proposal, and receiving the proposed budget, the projectors and computers are ordered.

·        I’ll take a trip to UCI, UCLA, and/or UCSB to find an ideal location for the installation.

·        At that time, the Ethernet connection to the network is setup and planning is established.

·        The installation site at the local campus (UCB) will be prepared, and then a test run will be performed.

·        After consultation with Prof. Shawn Brixey at the UC Berkeley's Art Department, the final site will be confirmed (I already know the site which is the entrance to the Art Department).

·        The glass panels will be ordered, and working with my partner and fellow Architecture graduate student Nicola Probst will install the glass walls, projector, and the computer at the designated location, UCB.

·        The projection will be tested and aimed for optimum quality.

·        After a successful installation of the UCB site, we will come to the remote/participating campus, and begin installation.

·        At this time, we will do a test run and the projection will be adjusted at the remote campus.

·        The computers will be given a password and some of the aspects will be controlled, such as getting on the network and browsing other areas of it.

·        There will be some publicity posters and flyers produced to ensure word of mouth is not the only way of acknowledgment.

·        I will make a simple and direct Web site to explain the project mission and further publicize it.

·        If there are any money left over will be for a simple opening reception at both sites where the installation will have it’s first broadcasting live, and the public will participate.

·        There be two volunteers or designated graduate students at each campus to take charge of the project during the life of it (I’ll personally describe the process to them. It is easier than working in the library! Will take 15 min to turn on and 10 min to turn off the whole set up)

·        After the end of the project the disassembly will be easy and 90% of the equipment is salvageable, thus can be used for the Art Department of each participating schools.

The set up is quite swift. The actual time frame of these two installation processes are one or two weekends for each campus to set up and one full day to test run the installation and perform adjustments for optimum projection. Please note I tried to be very descriptive, to help in visualization of the possible potential of such project. Now here is some positive characters of a public art project such as this one: Its medium is the latest popular technology. It is sculptural, yet pictorial. Visually it is very pleasing, inviting and entertaining. The operation is user friendly, geared toward engaging the general public with or without cyber knowledge. The means of the project is electronic communication, which is the most sought after technical realm today. It is an open door to accessibility and free forum of exchanging ideas. It is collaborative and the outcome is freshly varied day to day. It can inspire many other minds to think of what alternatives are possible in combining technology and art…

Amir Soltani